BUT PEOPLE COME DOWN ON SHANKAR.
http://gopalshroti.wordpress.com
SHANKAR'S PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY WAS DIFFERENT FROMOTHER MDs AND STARS....HE WAS A 'PAHALWAN' AND A PUCCA 'TABLA ANDDHOLAK' EXPERT AND WAS A CLASSICAL DANCER.....WITH SO MANY QUALITIESHOW SHANKAR CUD BE TREATED AGAINST HIS RESERVED NATURE.....EVERYBODY CANNOT BE OPENMINDED. CAN ANYBODY SAY OP NAYYAR WAS AN EGOIST, WAS HE AGAINST LATABAI.....IT WAS HIS NATURE.....LIKE A COCONUT WHICH IS HARD AS WELL AS SOFT, CUD THESE QUALITIES BE NOT FOUND IN EVERY HUMANBEING....SO SHANKAR AND OP WERE AS HUMAN BEINGS AS OTHERS.....BUT CUDNOT BOW TO THE OTHERS FOOLHARDINESS...(NOT LATABAI)....SO THEY WERE CRITICISED FOR WHAT.....FOR THE QUALITIES U HAVE, I HAVE, .....ARE WE EGOISTS.....ARE WE HUMBLE AND MEEK THROUGHOUT OUR LIFE WITHOUT SELFRESPECT.......CRITICISM IS EASY BUT MAINTAIN DISCIPLINE IN REAL LIFE IS NOT BEARABLE......NOBODY CRITICISES KISHORE KUMAR FOR HIS WHIMS,AND CLEARCUT EGOISM......BUT LAUGH AT HIS IDIOSYNCRACIES......WAS HE NOT A GREAT ARTIST?.......WHY LATAJI DID NOT SING FOR AGED SD BURMANDA.....WAS BURMANDA EGOIST.......THERE ARE SEVERAL EXAMPLE IN FILM INDUSTRY......BUT PEOPLE COME DOWN ON SHANKAR. WAS SHANKAR AND JAI WERE NOT SELECTED MANY TIMES AS PRESIDENT OF MD's ASSOCIATION. MADAN MOHAN WAS KING OF GAZALS, BUT ONCE IN MD's MEETINGS WHEN THE PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY ETC WERE ELECTED......IT HAPPENED THAT ALL IN ONE VOICE DECLARED MADAN MOHAN AS 'PRINCE' AND ON THE PART OF MADANMOHAN, HE THEN AND THERE HAILED SHANKER JAIKISHAN AS 'KINGS' OF FILM MUSIC OF HINDI FILM INDUSTRY......THEY WERE ALL FRIENDS AND MET REGULARLY AND PHONED EACH OTHER ON THEIR SUCCESSFUL SCORES.......LATAJI REVOLTED FOR THE ROYALTY.....WAS IT HER EGO.......YES IF IT WAS EGO THEN IT IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF OTHERS......SO SHANKAR WAS EGOIST IN ONLY CREATING THE IMMORTABLE NUMBERS.....GOD BLESS HIS SOUL FOR SO MUCH GREAT CONTRIBUTION TO US,THE MUSIC LOVERS IN THE FORM OF ''MUJHKO CHAHIYE BAHAR........''(AWARA). THANKS. gshroti
No comments:
Post a Comment